Maximize Monoclonal Antibody Yields With Peptones
Whitepaper
Published: June 19, 2025

Credit: iStock
Peptones have proven to be a transformative tool in boosting monoclonal antibody (mAb) yields. Their use in CHO cell bioprocessing has significantly improved productivity, protein quality and cell growth, contributing to a 59% increase in average mAb titers since 2008.
However, challenges remain. Variability in optimal peptone concentration, lot-to-lot consistency and differential effects across cell lines can impact process outcomes. Understanding and controlling these variables is key to unlocking further gains in yield and quality.
This whitepaper explores how peptones have already improved yields and highlights strategies to fine-tune their application for even greater performance.
Download this whitepaper to discover:
- How peptones have driven higher mAb titers and improved cell viability across multiple CHO cell lines
- The role of concentration and timing in maximizing peptone effectiveness
- How to manage peptone variability to support consistent, high-quality bioproduction
The Role of Peptones in Boosting
Monoclonal Antibody Production
Source: Thermo Fisher Scientific
Article
White paper | 10263176
The utilization of peptones in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell
bioprocessing has emerged as a pivotal strategy for enhancing
monoclonal antibody (mAb) production. Peptones — biologicallyderived protein hydrolysates — have been shown to significantly
improve productivity across various CHO cell lines, contributing
to higher yields, enhanced protein quality, and robust cell
growth. These improvements align with the biomanufacturing
industry’s goals of achieving high yields, efficient processes, and
stable products.
Since 2008, the average mAb titer has increased from
1.95 grams per liter (g/L) to 3.09 g/L in 2024 — a testament
to advancements in process optimization and raw material
utilization. Peptones have played a crucial role in this progress
by addressing key productivity challenges. However, variations
in titer, protein quality, and cell growth often complicate process
management. To mitigate these issues, strategic approaches,
such as key driver identification methods and test-and-hold
procedures, are essential for enabling consistent performance.
Real-world data highlights the specific effects of peptones on
CHO cell line performance, underscoring their ability to enhance
mAb yields and improve overall process efficiency. Yet challenges
such as lot-to-lot variability in peptones can impact bioprocess
consistency. The mechanisms by which peptones enhance CHO
cell productivity, the impact of peptone variability on titer, protein
quality, and cell growth, and strategies to mitigate these impacts
are all crucial considerations for developers working to optimize
their mAb. By leveraging these insights, biomanufacturers can
harness the full potential of peptones to boost quality and yield
while supporting process robustness and efficiency.
An Evaluation of Peptone Impact on Three Distinct CHO
Cell Lines
Peptones are complex mixtures containing polypeptides, free
amino acids, carbohydrates, salts, trace metals, and other
components that provide vital nutrients for cell culture. They
can be sourced from animal-based or animalfree origins, such
as yeast or plant-based materials, offering flexibility to meet
regulatory and ethical considerations.
Beyond their nutritive role, peptones provide protective effects
for CHO cells through nutritional buffering and other mechanisms
that help maintain cell health and delay apoptosis. These benefits
are critical for optimizing monoclonal antibody production, as
healthier cells contribute to higher titers and improved protein
quality. In recent case studies, Thermo Fisher Scientific
evaluated the impact of peptones on three distinct CHO cell lines.
The first cell line, a CHO-K1 line
expressing a mAb, was evaluated in a
14 day simple fed-batch study using only
CD medium and peptones in duplicate
Ambr15 bioreactors; 3 g/L or 6 g/L of
each peptone was added on day 0 to
the chemically defined basal medium.
The following animal-origin free (AOF)
peptones were evaluated as part of
this study:
• Difco™ TC Yeastolate UF (TCY),
• Gibco™ Cotton Peptone 200 UF
(Cotton),
• Gibco™ Soy 100 (Soy),
• Difco™ Phytone Supplement UF
(Phytone),
• Gibco™ Wheat 100 UF (Wheat)
Ecient Pro
Ecient Pro +1.5g/L TCY
Ecient Pro +3g/L TCY
Ecient Pro +6g/L TCY
Ecient Pro +3g/L cotton
Ecient Pro +6g/L cotton
Ecient Pro +3g/L soy
Ecient Pro +6g/L soy
Ecient Pro +3g/L phytone
Ecient Pro +6g/L phytone
Ecient Pro +3g/L wheat
Ecient Pro +6g/L wheat
20
15
10
5
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
Change lgG (%)
6.72
14.28
6.38 7.99
–16.38
12.70
16.30 15.42
0 –1.15 –1.57 –13.31
In Case Study 1, 3 g/L cotton, soy and wheat showed the strongest positive titer impact with 13%
to 16% relative titer improvement relative to control.
Each batch was supplemented with 6 mML-glutamine and 1% Gibco™ Anti-Clumping
Agent; cell counts and viability were measured using a Beckman Coulter Life Sciences
Vi-CELL™ Cell Counter, and titers were measured using a Roche Cedex™ BioHT Analyzer.
The primary goals of the study were to determine whether the selected peptones had
a titration effect at certain concentrations, which would negatively affect titers, as well
as to identify optimal peptones and their concentrations for increasing productivity
while maintaining consistency and quality. The results of this evaluation showed that
the cotton, wheat, and phytone peptones significantly enhanced mAb titer and cell
viability under controlled conditions. The specific results, when compared to the
unsupplemented control, were:
• Wheat—14% increase at 3 g/L and 7% increase at 6 g/L
• Cotton – 16% increase at 3 g/L and a 15% increase at 6 g/L
• Phytone – 8% increase at 3 g/L and a 6% increase at 6 g/L
High cell viability and viable cell density (VCD) were also observed, making these
three peptones promising candidates for further testing. Conversely, the TCY and soy
peptones showed a negative impact on titer at one or both concentrations:
• TCY—loss of –2% was observed at 3 g/L and of -13% at 6 g/L
• Soy—increase of 13% occurred at 3 g/L, while a loss of –16% was observed at 6 g/L
Case Study 1: CHO K-1 and AOF Peptones
2 thermofisher.com/peptones
Building on these findings, fed-batch studies were conducted to evaluate the selected
peptones in a more complex production environment. The addition of a proprietary
blend of cotton and wheat peptones (C&W1 and C&W2), especially at 3 g/L with a
subsequent boost on Day 11, yielded the highest titer increase, reaching up to 51% and
64.5% improvement over the control. These conditions maintained robust growth and
high viability, establishing the cotton/wheat blend as a standout performer.
Protein quality was another critical factor assessed; charge variant analysis was
conducted with cation exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
coupled to a UV detector; protein aggregation analysis was performed using size
exclusion HPLC with UV detection; and glycan profiles were analyzed with hydrophilic
interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), ultra performance liquid chromatography
(UPLC) and fluorescence detection.
+1g/L cotton
+3g/L cotton
+1g/L wheat
+3g/L wheat
+1g/L soy
+3g/L soy
C&W1
C&W2
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Change in lgG concentration vs no peptone control (%)
Change vs control (%)
19.19
34.03
44.15
8.94
2.30 4.81
51.38
64.51
During Case Study 1, the cotton and wheat blends (C&W1 and C&W2) demonstrated the strongest titer
enhancement, with 51% and 64% relative titer to control. Titer enhancement of 44% with 3 g/L wheat and
34% with 3 g/L cotton single peptones were also demonstrated.
thermofisher.com/peptones 3
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Charge variants
Area (%)
2%
45.73 44.91
9.37 9.37
2%+1g/L cotton
49.94
40.68
2%+3g/L cotton
52.70
37.88
9.43
2%+1g/L wheat
47.14
43.22
9.64
2%+3g/L wheat
55.90
35.25
8.85
2%+1g/L soy
51.81
38.90
9.29
2%+3g/L soy
57.77
32.87
9.36
2%+1g/L
CW blend
55.49
35.81
8.69
2%+3.25g/L
CW blend
56.27
34.95
8.78
% Acidic variant % Main peak % Basic variant
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Area (%)
57.97
17.35
6.51
3.05 4.46
56.66
20.27
7.58
4.19 3.28
58.54
19.49
7.45
3.82 3.08
55.37
19.76
7.16
3.96 4.36
62.84
16.96
6.27
3.33 3.03
48.20
25.34
8.55 7.01
3.16
47.55
26.94
9.61
6.19
2.19
61.70
17.68
6.60
3.30 3.06
60.28
18.56
7.02
3.50 3.04
G0F (NGA2F) G1Fa (NA2G1F) G1Fb (NA2G1F) G2F (NA2F) Man-5
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+1g/L cotton
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+3g/L cotton
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+1g/L wheat
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+3g/L wheat
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+1g/L soy
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+3g/L soy
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+1g/L CW blend
Ecient Pro Feed 1
(2%)+3.25g/L CW blend
In Case Study 1, the addition of peptones demonstrated increases in the main peaks and a decrease in the acidic peaks, while the
basic peaks showed relatively little change from control.
Across all peptones, a consistent decrease in acidic variance and an increase in the
main peak were observed, indicating a positive impact on charge variance without
significant changes in basic peaks. Additionally, evaluation of aggregation and
fragmentation showed no change with the addition of a peptone.
Glycan profiles remained stable across most peptones, with the soy peptone
demonstrating a unique ability to modulate glycan levels by reducing G0F and increasing
G1F and G2F. The addition of cotton and wheat peptones demonstrated comparable
N-glycan profiles or the potential to shift glycans to less or more mature structures.
Finally, immunogenic Man-5 glycans with peptones remained within acceptably low
ranges of less than 5%.
To support the reliability of these results, the study also investigated lot-to-lot
consistency for peptones across multiple experiments. IgG titers, VCD, and protein
quality metrics consistently exhibited variability below 15%, well within acceptable
biological and analytical ranges. This demonstrated the reproducibility and reliability of
peptone performance, a crucial factor for large-scale biomanufacturing.
4 thermofisher.com/peptones
+ 1% Feed 1 (Control) + 1% Feed 1 + 1 g/L cotton (Day 0) + 1% Feed 1 + 1 g/L cotton (Day 0 and Day 8)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
–5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
e
6 cells/m
L
VCD
The cells were cultured in a chemically
defined medium and the feed was added
each day starting on day 3 through
day 13 at 1.5% v/v. Viable cell density
(VCD), cell viability, and mAb titers were
measured using a Vi-CELL™ counter,
alongside analyses of aggregation,
charge variants, and N-glycans to assess
product quality. The control for this
study was a combination of the media
and feed without any other additions.
Ecient-Pro
+1 g/L cotton Feed 1
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Titer
Average titer relaitve change to control (%)
38%
Ecient-Pro
+1 g/L cotton Feed 1
Cotton D8
52%
In Case Study 2, Feed 1 in conjunction with the Cotton peptone saw an
increase in titer of more than 50 percent at Day 8 relative to the control.
A second study was conducted to evaluate the impact of AOF peptones on CHO-K1
GS cells producing immunoglobulin G (IgG) mAb. Using a Sartorius Ambr® 15 system, a
14-day fed-batch assay was performed in duplicate.
Case Study 2: CHO-K1 GS and Cotton Peptone 200 UF
There were two experimental conditions in this study:
• Experimental condition 1 involved the addition of 1g/L of Gibco Cotton 200 UF to the
basal medium on day 0 while keeping the feeding schedule the same as the control.
• Experimental condition 2 involved the addition of 1g/L of Gibco Cotton 200 UF to the
basal medium on day 0 and a subsequent addition on day 8 while keeping the feeding
schedule the same as the control.
Experimental conditions 1 and 2 outperformed the control in terms of viable cell density
and sustained higher viability than the control. For terminal IgG titers, both experimental
conditions 1 and 2 outperformed the control by 38% and 52%, respectively.
thermofisher.com/peptones 5
The third study evaluated the effects of three select peptones—
Phytone, Wheat, and Cotton—on growth and titer of DG44 CHO
cells cultured in CD basal medium. The objective was to identify
lead candidate peptones and determine initial concentration
limits for further evaluation. Peptones were added to the CD
basal medium on day 0, alongside supplements of 4 mM Gibco™
GlutaMAX™ and 1:250 Gibco™ Anti-Clumping Agent. Cell growth
and viability were measured using the Vi-CELL™ Cell Counter, while
mAb titers were quantified using the Cedex™ BioHT Analyzer.
Results showed that all peptones supported growth and
viability comparable to the CD control, except for 1 g/L
wheat, which demonstrated reduced growth by day 14.
Cotton peptone exhibited the strongest improvement in
mAb production, with supplementation at 0.5 g/L and 2 g/L
yielding a 37% and 33% increase in relative titer, respectively,
compared to the control. Phytone and Wheat peptones also
demonstrated moderate positive effects on productivity.
No peptone +0.5 g/L phytone +1 g/L phytone +2 g/L phytone
+0.5 g/L wheat +1 g/L wheat +2 g/L wheat
+0.5 g/L cotton +1g/L cotton +2 g/L cotton
0 3 5 7 10 12 14
Days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Average VCD (x 106 cell/mL)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Increase over control (%)
Change vs control (%)
.05g/L phytone
1g/L phytone
2g/L phytone
.05g/L wheat
1g/L wheat
2g/L wheat
.05g/L cotton
1g/L cotton
2g/L cotton
11
2
4 4
6
10
37
14
33
In conclusion, Gibco™ Cotton Peptone
200 UF emerged as the lead candidate,
with optimal concentrations identified
between 0.5 g/L and 2 g/L. Further
evaluations will focus on optimizing its use
in extended fed-batch cultures to improve
productivity while maintaining robust cell
growth and product quality.
Case Study 3: DG44 and Select Peptones
6 thermofisher.com/peptones
Peptones and Lot-to-Lot Consistency
The support of lot-to-lot consistency of peptones is a critical factor for bioprocesses,
particularly for the production mAbs. To establish the consistency of Gibco™ peptones
for mAbs processes, a study was conducted to evaluate several AO and AOF peptone
bases. The study involved multiple lots — four for Yeastolate and Phytone, and three for
Bacto, Proteose, and Cotton — using a shake flask model with a single CHO cell line
expressing an IgG mAb.
Lot 1
Gibco Bacto Proteose No. 3
Gibco Difco TC Yeastolate, UF
lgG titer
Lot 2 Lot 3
Lot 1
Gibco Cotton Peptone 200 UF
lgG titer
Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 1 lgG titer
Lot 2 Lot 3
Lot 4 Lot 1
Gibco Difco Phytone Supplement, UF
lgG titer
Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4
CHO-K1 cells expressing
lgG molecules were grown
in CHO Panel Medium #6
supplemented with
6 mM L-glutamine and
1% anti-clumping agent
A growth performance
assay was performed
on multiple peptones
to evaluate consistency
between distinct lots
and measure key cell
culture metrics
Gibco Difco TC
Yeastolate, UF
Gibco Difco
Phytone
Supplement, UF
Gibco Bacto
Proteose No. 3
Gibco Difco
Soytone
Gibco Bacto
Yeast Extract
Gibco Cotton
Peptone 200 UF
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
lgG: lot-to-lot variance
(%)
3.5
0.7
2.2
9.2
1.7 1.3
Gibco Difco TC
Yeastolate, UF
Gibco Difco TC
Phytone
Supplement, UF
Gibco Bacto
Proteose No. 3
Gibco Difco
Soytone
Gibco Bacto
Yeast Extract
Gibco Cotton
Peptone 200 UF
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Viable cell density: lot-to-lot variance
(%)
2.3 2.6
7.8 7.7
4.9 5.2
thermofisher.com/peptones 7
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. © 2025 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries unless otherwise specified. WTP-10263176 0425
Learn more at thermofisher.com/peptones
Harvest IgG titers were assessed across all tested lots, revealing strong consistency
with variance levels below 15%, a threshold accounting for biological and instrument
variation. The coefficient of variance for IgG titer and viable cell density demonstrated
minimal spread across multiple lots for each peptone, highlighting their reliability. Protein
quality metrics, such as charge variants and glycan profiles, were also analyzed across
the lots. Consistent results were observed for the acidic, main, and basic peaks of
charge variants, as well as glycan species including G0F, G1F, G2, G2F, and Man-5.
This comprehensive study demonstrated the robust lot-to-lot consistency of Gibco™
peptones across key metrics — IgG titer, viable cell density, charge variants, and glycan
profiles. These findings underscore the suitability of Gibco™ peptones for reliable and
reproducible performance in mAb production processes, supporting consistent product
quality and process outcomes.
Charge variants
Area (%)
TCY UF (n=4)
% Acidic variant % Main peak % Basic variant
Phytone UF (n=4) Bacto YE (n=3) Cotton 200 UF (n=3)
Glycan profile for various peptones’ lots
Area (%)
TCY UF (n=4) Phytone UF (n=4) Bacto YE (n=3) Cotton 200 UF (n=3)
G0F (NGA24) Man-5 G1Fa (NA2G1F) G1Fb (NA2G1F) G2F (NA2F)
Brought to you by

Download the Whitepaper for FREE Now!
Information you provide will be shared with the sponsors for this content. Technology Networks or its sponsors may contact you to offer you content or products based on your interest in this topic. You may opt-out at any time.
Experiencing issues viewing the form? Click here to access an alternate version