The rise of highly potent novel synthetic opioids (NSO) has significantly impacted forensic and clinical toxicology, with nitazenes emerging as particularly dangerous.
NSO detection in dried blood spot (DBS) samples has several advantages compared to traditional matrices, including minimal invasiveness, small sample volume requirements, increased analyte stability and convenient sample storage and transport.
However, sensitive LC-MS/MS instrumentation and optimized sample preparation procedures are required for accurate quantitation of NSO trace levels in DBS samples.
This application note highlights a complete extraction-to-analysis method that offers the exceptional sensitivity and robust quantitation needed to analyze nine nitazene analogs and brorphine in DBS samples.
Download this app note to discover:
- Cutting-edge LC-MS technology for reliable analysis of NSO
- How to detect trace levels of NSO from just 10 μL of blood
- An optimized sample preparation procedure that can be applied to other NSOs
Christina Ververi1,2, Marta Massano1,2, Martina Galletto1,2, Eugenio
Alladio1
, Marco Vincenti1,2, Alberto Salomone1,2, and Pierre Negri3
1
Dipartimento di Chimica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin,
Italy; 2
Centro Regionale Antidoping e di Tossicologia “A.
Bertinaria”, Orbassano, Turin, Italy; 3
SCIEX, USA
This technical note demonstrates a comprehensive workflow for
the analysis of 9 nitazene analogs and brorphine in dried blood
spots (DBS). Using the SCIEX 7500 system, and only 10 µL of
blood with the Capitainer®B DBS sampling cards, the method
achieved limits of quantitation (LOQ) from 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL.
Further, good sensitivity and quantitative performance was
shown at the 1 ng/mL calibrator with precision <15% and
accuracy within ±19% (see Figure 1 for XICs). The optimized
sample extraction procedure resulted in matrix effects within
85–115% and ion suppression values between -15 and 15% due
to blood and filter paper components. The method recovery was
between 15–20%, typical for drug compounds in DBS.
Key benefits for the analysis of nitazenes and
brorphine in DBS using the SCIEX 7500 system
• Efficient extraction method. Fast and optimized procedure
for extracting novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) from DBS
• Low-ng/mL sensitivity with minimal sample volume. LOQs
ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL using the 7500 system and only
10 μL of blood on DBS cards
• Good quantitative performance. Precision (%CV) <15% and
accuracy (%bias) <19% were measured for the 10 analytes at
the lowest (1 ng/mL) calibrator level
• Minimized matrix effects and ion suppression. Matrix effects
due to blood and filter paper ranged between 85 and 115%,
resulting in ion suppression values between -15 to 15%
• Wide method applicability. The method can be extended to
include a larger number of synthetic opioids as new
substances emerge onto the recreational drug market
Sensitive quantitation of 9 nitazene analogs and brorphine in dried blood spots (DBS)
Figure 1. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) for brorphine and 9 nitazene compounds at 1 ng/mL in extracted DBS using the SCIEX 7500 system.
2
Introduction
The introduction of highly potent novel synthetic opioids (NSOs)
to the recreational drug market has contributed to the
significant rise in accidental drug overdoses. In recent years,
nitazenes, a class of synthetic opioids originally developed as
potent pain reliever opioid analgesics in the 1950s, has
emerged in the illicit drug supply. Nitazenes have been
implicated in overdose mortality, primarily due to their
exceptionally high potency. Nitazenes have also been found as
adulterants in street heroin, cocaine and other counterfeit
preparations that are designed to mimic the effects of
controlled opioids. Nitazenes are a major public health challenge
due to the high occurrence of intoxications and accidental
fatalities in combined opioid drug toxicity cases.
NSO detection can be performed in a variety in biological
matrices including blood, urine and oral fluid. While these
conventional matrices provide a reliable means of detecting
NSOs, the use of DBS has become an extremely valuable and
straightforward alternative. Compared to traditional venous
blood sampling, DBS analysis has many advantages including
(1) minimally invasive sample collection procedures, (2) small
sample volume requirements, (3) increased analyte stability,
and (4) logistical advantages such as convenient sample
storage and transport with reduced chance of sample
adulteration or degradation. Given the small sample volume in
DBS (usually in the 5-50 µL range) and the high potency of
nitazenes, accurate quantitation at trace levels requires the use
of sensitive LC-MS/MS instrumentation. Therefore, an optimized
sample preparation procedure was developed to selectively
extract these substances from DBS, in combination with the
ultra-trace level sensitivity of the SCIEX 7500 system, for a
panel of 9 nitazene analogs and brorphine. The developed
method provided the ability to quantify low levels of NSOs
extracted from DBS with excellent precision and accuracy. Full
results are presented in the associated peer-reviewed paper.1
Methods
Target analytes and samples: A panel of 10 analytes, including
9 nitazene analogs and brorphine, as well as the internal
standard, fentanyl-D5, were purchased from Comedical (Trento,
Italy). Two solutions were prepared: a 100 ng/mL standard
mixture containing the 10 target analytes in methanol and a 1.0
µg/mL fentanyl-D5 internal standard solution in
methanol/acetonitrile (3:1, v/v) which was used as the
extracting solvent. Table 3 lists the name, LOD, linear correlation
value (R2
), accuracy (%bias) and precision (%CV) at the lowest
calibrator level (1 ng/mL), as well as the matrix effect (%), ion
suppression (%) and recovery (%) at three calibrator levels (1, 10
and 50 ng/mL) for each of the 10 analytes targeted in this panel.
Calibrator preparation: Six levels of calibrators were prepared
by spiking the standard solution mix into blank human whole
blood to final concentrations of 1, 2, 5, 10, 25 and 50 ng/mL.
Figure 2. Procedure for the extraction of 9 nitazene analogs and brophine from DBS cards. A 10-step sample extraction protocol was optimized to selectively extract
the 10 analytes from DBS using Capitainer®B cards for analysis using the SCIEX 7500 system.
3
Sample preparation and DBS sample extraction procedure:
Capitainer®B cards were used as the micro-sampling devices.
These cards are haematocrit-independent and designed to
ensure that the exact amount of blood is flowed into the
microfluidic tube while the excess volume is diverted to another
collection disc. 50 μL aliquots of blank human whole blood were
fortified with a working solution of all ten analytes at six
calibrator levels. 30 μL of the spiked whole blood calibrator
solutions were deposited on the Capitainer®B card, 10 μL spots
were generated and allowed to dry for at least 3 hr at room
temperature. The spots were punched out and extracted with
500 μL of methanol/acetonitrile (3:1, v/v) fortified with the
fentanyl-D5 internal standard solution (final concentration of
1.0 µg/mL). The extraction mixture was stirred and then
sonicated at room temperature for 30 minutes. The resulting
extract was transferred to a fresh tube and dried under a
stream of nitrogen at room temperature and then reconstituted
in 30 μL of methanol. The extraction procedure is summarized
in Figure 2.
Liquid chromatography: Chromatographic separation was
performed using an ExionLC system with a Phenomenex Kinetex
C18 column (100 x 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm, 00D-4475-AN) held at 45ºC.
Mobile phases used consisted of (A) 5mM formic acid in water
and (B) 5mM formic acid in acetonitrile. The LC flow rate was 0.5
mL/min and the total run time was 10 min. The injection volume
was 1 µL. The LC gradient conditions used are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Chromatographic gradient for the analysis of nitazene analogs
and brorphine in DBS using the SCIEX 7500 system.
Time
(min)
Mobile phase A
(%)
Mobile phase B
(%)
0.0 95 5
0.5 95 5
8.0 5 95
8.5 5 95
8.6 95 5
10 95 5
Mass spectrometry: Samples were analyzed using a SCIEX
7500 system equipped with an OptiFlow Pro Ion Source and E
Lens probe. The ionization source was equipped with an
electrospray ionization (ESI) probe that was operated in positive
mode. A single acquisition method consisting of 22 MRM
transitions, 20 for the 9 nitazene analogs and brorphine and 2
for fentanyl-D5, was created using the Scheduled MRM
algorithm in SCIEX OS. Table 2 shows the optimized source and
gas parameters used. Two MRM transitions were monitored for
each of the 10 targeted analytes and each calibrator was
injected in triplicate.
Data processing: Data processing was performed using SCIEX
OS software (version 3.4). Quantitative analysis was conducted
in the Analytics module, using the MQ4 algorithm, automatically
generating the calibration curves, concentration calculations,
and assay precision and accuracy statistics.
Table 2. Optimized source and gas parameters for the analysis of nitazene
analogs and brorphine using the SCIEX 7500 system.
Parameter Value
Polarity Positive
Ion source gas 1 30 psi
Ion source gas 2 70 psi
Curtain gas 40 psi
Source temperature 600°C
Ion spray voltage 1500 V
CAD gas 7 psi
4
Chromatographic separation of nitazenes and
brorphine in DBS extracts
Figure 3 shows the chromatographic separation of the targeted
analytes in a 10 ng/mL human whole blood calibrator sample.
The selection of the Phenomenex Kinetex C18 column, and the
optimized mobile phase composition and gradient conditions,
achieved the baseline separation of the 10 targeted analytes
within the 10 min run time. This included the isomeric species,
isotonitazene and protonitazene. The baseline separation of
these two analytes ensured good data quality.
Robust detection method leads to accurate and
sensitive analyte quantitation
The ability to accurately detect trace levels of highly potent NSO
in human whole blood is critical to toxicologists as it provides
valuable insight into the causation of accidental overdoses. The
series of calibrator solutions were injected in triplicate to
evaluate the quantitative performance of the system to
accurately measure low levels of NSOs extracted from DBS with
a high level of precision and accuracy. Figure 4 shows
representative extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) for the two
MRM transitions monitored for A) brorphine and B)
isotonitazene, two highly potent NSO that have been linked to
accidental overdoses in poly-drug, authentic use cases. The
XICs display overlays of both the quantifier and qualifier ions for
a blank injection and for the 6 calibrator levels ranging from 1 to
50 ng/mL. Also displayed in Figure 4 are the confirmatory ion
ratio lines between the two transitions which help to visualize
the ion ratio tolerances. The lower limits of detection (LOD) for
the 10 targeted analytes ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL using
the 10 μL blood volume of the DBS. Further, Figure 1 shows XICs
and ion ratio tolerances for brorphine and the 9 targeted
nitazenes in the 1 ng/mL extracted DBS calibrator. Overall, the
method sensitivity observed is well within the relevant range for
monitoring low NSO levels in combined opioid drug toxicity
cases resulting in accidental overdoses.
The quantitative performance of the method was also evaluated
by calculating the average (n=3) precision (%CV) and accuracy
(%bias) at the lowest (1 ng/mL) calibrator level (Table 3). The
precision and accuracy values were found to be <15% and
<19%bias, respectively, at the 1 ng/mL calibrator level for the 10
target analytes. The results demonstrate the capability of the
method to reliably quantify NSO in DBS at trace level sensitivity
with excellent accuracy and precision.
Figure 3. Overlaid extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of the 9 targeted nitazenes and brorphine. Baseline separation of the 10 analytes, including isomeric species,
was achieved using the 10-minute gradient. The method was built using the Scheduled MRM algorithm in the SCIEX OS software. The numbered peaks are assigned as
follows: 1. metodesnitazene, 2. etodesnitazene, 3. metonitazene, 4. flunitazene, 5. brorphine, 6. N-pyrrolidino etonitazene, 7. etonitazepine, 8. isotonitazene,
9. protonitazene, and 10. butonitazene.
5
Figure 4. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) for brorphine and isonitazene in extracted DBS using the SCIEX 7500 system. XICs show overlays of both the quantifier
and qualifier ions from 1 to 50 ng/mL. Also shown is the ion ratio line tolerance overlay to visualize the ion ratio confidence levels. The sensitivity of the 7500 system
enabled robust quantification of NSO down to 1 ng/mL, with limits of the detection ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL for the 10 analytes.
6
Calibration curves were generated using the two MRM
transitions monitored for each analyte. Figure 5 shows the
resulting regression curves plotted from 1 to 50 ng/mL for each
of the 10 NSO targeted in this study. The calibration curves
demonstrated excellent linearity across the calibration series,
with R2 values greater than 0.990 for the 10 targeted analytes.
Optimized sample extraction procedure leads to low
matrix effects and low ion suppression
Developing a fast sample extraction procedure capable of
extracting opioid analgesics is critical to attaining reproducible
results. The efficiency of the sample extraction procedure was
investigated by calculating the matrix effect (%), ion
suppression (%) and recovery (%) at three calibrator levels (1, 10
and 50 ng/mL). Three replicates of blank dried blood samples,
three spots without blood and three samples without the filter
paper (extraction solvents only) were spiked with the target
analytes and internal standard.
The matrix effect (%) was calculated as the percentage ratio
between the matrix-matched standard response to the neat
standard response for the three calibrator levels. The ion
suppression was calculated by subtracting the calculated
matrix effect (%) from 100%. The matrix effects due to the
blood and filter paper components ranged between 85 and
115%, resulting in ion suppression values corrected by internal
standard between -15 and 15%.
The recovery was calculated as the mean peak area spiked preand post-extraction (n=3), expressed as a percentage. The
recovery values were between 15 and 20%. Although the
recovery was low, they are within the range typically observed
for DBS studies.2 This observation highlights the necessity of
using deuterated internal standards in DBS workflows to
compensate for analyte loss. Fentanyl-D5 was used as the
internal standard in this study. Despite being low, the recovery
values are reproducible across the calibration range and across
the NSOs targeted in this study. The quantitative performance of
the method, including the LOD, linear correlation (R2 values), as
well as the precision (%CV) and accuracy (%bias) values at the
lowest calibrator level (1 ng/mL), matrix effect (%), ion
suppression (%) and recovery (%) at three calibrator levels are
summarized in Table 3.
Figure 5. Linearity for the 9 nitazene compounds and brorphine extracted from DBS. Good linearity shown with R2 values >0.990 for all analytes. Calibration
curves were generated using the two MRM transitions for each of the 10 analytes monitored.
Table 3: Quantitative performance of the method for the analysis of 9 nitazene analogs and brorphine in DBS using the 7500 system. Compound name, LOD,
linear correlation (R2 values), and precision (%CV) and accuracy (%bias) at the lowest calibrator level (1 ng/mL), matrix effect (%), ion suppression (%) and
recovery (%) at three calibrator levels (1, 10, and 50 ng/mL) is shown.
Compound name LOD
(ng/mL)
Linear
correlation
value (R2
)
Mean precision
(%CV) at 1
ng/mL (n=3)
Mean accuracy
(%bias) at 1
ng/mL (n=3)
Concentration
(ng/mL)
Matrix
effect (%)
Ion suppression
(%)
Recovery
(%)
Brorphine 0.5 0.997 12 18
1 78 -22 22
10 88 12 11
50 102 2 15
Butonitazene 0.4 0.992 11 6.2
1 116 16 15
10 103 3 12
50 112 12 19
Etodesnitazene 0.4 0.992 12 19
1 79 -21 22
10 85 -15 11
50 99 1 19
Etonitazepipne 0.5 0.991 5.8 18
1 113 13 27
10 97 -3 11
50 107 7 15
Flunitazene 0.4 0.991 13 13
1 107 7 25
10 101 1 12
50 105 5 19
Isotonitazene 0.3 0.991 8.5 19
1 112 12 25
10 103 3 12
50 108 8 20
Metodesnitazene 0.4 0.990 10 12
1 79 -21 23
10 84 -16 13
50 96 -4 22
Metonitazene 0.4 0.990 6.7 19
1 104 4 26
10 107 7 12
50 110 10 21
N-pyrrolidino
etonitazene 0.4 0.990 8.4 16
1 93 -7 22
10 88 -12 11
50 106 6 18
Protonitazene 0.4 0.991 5.4 7.9
1 123 23 26
10 107 7 11
50 109 9 17
The SCIEX clinical diagnostic portfolio is For In Vitro Diagnostic Use. Rx Only. Product(s) not available in all countries. For information on availability, please contact
your local sales representative or refer to https://sciex.com/diagnostics. All other products are For Research Use Only. Not for use in Diagnostic Procedures.
Trademarks and/or registered trademarks mentioned herein, including associated logos, are the property of AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. or their respective owners in the United
States and/or certain other countries (see www.sciex.com/trademarks). Kinetex™ is a trademark of Phenomenex.
© 2025 DH Tech. Dev. Pte. Ltd. MKT-33793-A
Headquarters
500 Old Connecticut Path | Framingham, MA 01701
USA
Phone 508-383-7700
sciex.com
International Sales
For our office locations please call the division
headquarters or refer to our website at
sciex.com/offices
Conclusions
This technical note demonstrated:
• A fast extraction method providing selective extraction of
nitazenes and brorphine from DBS with minimal matrix effect
and ion suppression
• Detection levels ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 ng/mL for the 10
target analytes were achieved using a blood sample volume of
only 10 μL
• Good quantitative performance with precision (%CV) <15%
and accuracy (%bias) <19% at the 1 ng/mL calibrator level
• Excellent linearity, with R2 values > 0.990 for the 10 analytes
included in this panel across the calibration range (1 to 50
ng/mL)
• Reproducible quantitation for low-level detection of nitazenes
and brorphine from DBS, despite low analyte recovery
• A sample preparation procedure, combined with the tracelevel sensitivity of the 7500 system, that can be applied to
other novel synthetic opioids as they emerge onto the
recreational drug market
References
1. Ververi, C.; Galletto, M.; Massano, M.; Alladio, E.; Vincenti, M.;
Salomone, A. Method development for the quantification of
nine nitazene analogs and brorphine in dried blood spots
utilizing liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2024, 241, 115975. DOI:
10.1016/j.jpba.2024.115975
2. Massano, M.; Incardona, C.; Gerace, E.; Negri, P.; Alladio, E.;
Salomone, A.; Vincenti, M. Development and validation of a
UHPLC-HRMS-QTOF method for the detection of 132 new
psychoactive substances and synthetic opioids, including
fentanyl, in dried blood spots. Talanta 2022, 241, 123265.
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123265